Is local anaesthetic drug allergy really common? A 10-year single-centre retrospective analysis

Main Article Content

Nihal Yıldırım https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7077-3776
Mustafa Asım Demirkol https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6490-447X
ZEYNEP YEGİN KATRAN https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6858-6824
İsmet Bulut https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8111-6149

Keywords

Local anaesthetic hypersensitivity, drug allergy, skin testing, provocation test, lidocaine , multiple drug hypersensitivity

Abstract

Background: True allergic reactions to local anaesthetic (LA) agents are extremely rare, yet patients are frequently referred to allergy clinics with a history suggestive of LA hypersensitivity. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical characteristics, risk factors, and diagnostic outcomes of patients referred with suspected LA hypersensitivity.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all patients evaluated for suspected LA hypersensitivity between 2014 and 2025 in a tertiary allergy center. Demographic, clinical and laboratory data, including comorbid allergic diseases, total IgE, eosinophil count and serum tryptase levels, were analysed. All patients underwent standardised skin testing and, when indicated, subcutaneous provocation testing with preservative-free LA agents. Logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of LA hypersensitivity history.
Results: A total of 149 patients (mean age 46.7 ± 13.9 years; 83.9% females) were included. No confirmed cases of IgE-mediated LA hypersensitivity were detected. The most common comorbidities were atopy (50.0%), asthma (24.3%) and allergic rhinitis (34.4%). True LA hypersensitivity was not confirmed in any case; however, at least one safe agent was identified in 83.2% of patients, most frequently lidocaine (63.8%). In multivariate analysis, age was the only independent predictor of reporting LA hypersensitivity (Odds ratio (OR) = 1.02; P = 0.039). Atopy (OR = 0.36; P < 0.001) and asthma (OR = 0.28; P < 0.001) were found to be negative predictors, possibly reflecting referral bias. Multiple drug hypersensitivity was observed in 1.4% of patients, but was not an independent risk factor.
Conclusions: True local anaesthetic hypersensitivity is exceedingly rare. A detailed history combined with appropriate skin and provocation testing prevents unnecessary avoidance of safe agents. Referral bias and overestimation of risk remain common in clinical practice.

Abstract 0 | PDF Downloads 0 XML Downloads 0 HTML Downloads 0

References

1. Jiang S, Tang M. Allergy to local anesthetics is a rarity: Review of diagnostics and strategies for clinical management. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2023;64(2):193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-022-09937-x
2. Harboe T, Guttormsen AB, Aarebrot S, Dybendal T, Irgens A, Florvaag E. Suspected allergy to local anaesthetics: Follow-up in 135 cases. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010;54(5):536–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02193.x
3. Lisiecka MZ. Allergic reactions in dental practice: Classification of medicines, mechanisms of action, and clinical manifestations. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 20255;68(1):17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12016-025-09032-7
4. Trautmann A, Goebeler M, Stoevesandt J. Twenty years’ experience with anaphylaxis-like reactions to local anesthetics: Genuine allergy is rare. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6(6):2051–2058.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2018.04.005
5. YIlmaz I, Özdemir SK, Aydin Ö, Çelik GE. Local anesthetics allergy: Who should be tested? Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;50(2):66–71. https://doi.org/10.23822/EurAnnACI.1764-1489.38
6. Koca Kalkan I, Koycu Buhari G, Ates H, Basa Akdogan B, Erdem Ozdedeoglu O, Aksu K, et al. Identification of risk factors and cross-reactivity of local anesthetics hypersensitivity: Analysis of 14-years’ experience. J Asthma Allergy. 2021;14:47–58. https://doi.org/10.2147/JAA.S292442
7. Volcheck GW, Mertes PM. Local and general anesthetics immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2014;34(3):525–46, viii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2014.03.004
8. Barbaud A, Garvey LH, Torres M, Laguna JJ, Arcolaci A, Bonadonna P, et al. EAACI/ENDA position paper on drug provocation testing. Allergy. 2024;79:565–79. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15996
9. Schatz M. Allergic reactions to local anesthetics. In: Post TW, ed. UpToDate. Watham, MA: UpToDate Inc: 2017.
10. Bhole MV, Manson AL, Seneviratne SL, Misbah SA: IgE-mediated allergy to local anaesthetics: Separating fact from perception: A UK perspective. Br J Anaesthesia 2012; 108:903–11.
11. Kvisselgaard A, Mosbech H, Fransson S, Garvey LH. Risk of immediate type allergy to local anaesthetics is over- estimated—Results from 5 years of provocation testing in a Danish Allergy Clinic. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018;6:1217–23.
12. Kouba DJ, LoPiccolo MC, Alam M, Bordeaux JS, Cohen B, Hanke W, et al. Guidelines for the use of local anestesia in office-based dermatologic surgery. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016;74:1201–19.
13.Starling J III, Thosani MK, Coldiron BM. Determining the safety of office-based surgery: What 10 years of Florida data and 6 years of Alabama data reveal. Dermatol Surg. 2012;38:171–7.
14.Amici JM, Rogues AM, Lasheras A, Gachie JP, Guillot P, Beylot C, et al. A prospective study of the incidence of complications associated with dermatological surgery. Br J Dermatol. 2005;153:967–71.
15. Larson MJ, Taylor RS. Monitoring vital signs during outpatient Mohs and post-Mohs reconstructive surgery performed under local anesthesia. Dermatol Surg. 2004;30:777–83.
16. Perrott DH, Yuen JP, Andresen RV, Dodson TB. Office-based ambulatory anesthesia: Outcomes of clinical practice of oral and maxillofacial surgeons. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;61:983–95.
17. Zuo J, Gong R, Liu X, Zhao J. Risk of true allergy to local anesthetics: 10-year experience from an anesthesia allergy clinic in China. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2020;16:1297–303. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S280259
18. Guyer AC, Saff RR, Conroy M, Blumenthal KG, Camargo CA Jr, Long AA, et al. Comprehensive allergy evaluation is useful in the subsequent care of patients with drug hypersensitivity reactions during anesthesia. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015;3:94–100.
19. Erdeljic V, Francetic I, Likic R, Bakran I, Makar-Ausperger K, Simic P. Is referring patients with a positive history of allergic drug reactions or atopy for allergy testing to local anesthetics justified? Methods Find Exp Clin Pharmacol. 2009;31(3):177–82. https://doi.org/10.1358/mf.2009.31.3.1354126
20. Kemoklidze T, Topuridze N, Mchedlishvili L, Kamkamidze G. Risk factors ınfluencıng hypersensıtıvıty to the local anesthetıc drugs. Georgian Med News. 2022;(322):62–65.
21. Wöhrl S, Vigl K, Stingl G. Patients with drug reactions—Is it worth testing? Allergy 2006;61(8):928–34.
22. Mertes PM, Lambert M, Guéant-Rodriguez RM, Aimone-Gastin I, Mouton-Faivre C, Moneret-Vautrin DA, et al. Perioperative anaphylaxis. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2009;29:429–51.