Beyond sensitization: real-life thresholds for cat allergy in children
Main Article Content
Keywords
Cat allergy; children; cut-off values; skin prick test; specific IgE
Abstract
Background: Cat sensitization is common in patients with allergic diseases and may not always produce clinical symptoms.
Objective: This study aimed to assess the correlation between skin prick test (SPT), cat-specific immunoglobulin E (cat sIgE), and symptoms in sensitized children, and to determine optimal thresholds and predictors for clinical cat allergy.
Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 1052 cat-sensitized children (2017–2024) who underwent SPT and/or cat sIgE testing. Patients were grouped by presence of cat-related symptoms, and their clinical, laboratory, co-sensitization, and exposure characteristics were compared. Results: Clinical symptoms developed after exposure in 39% of cat-sensitized patients. The optimal cat sIgE cut-off was 1.05 kU/L (sensitivity 71.4% and specificity 93.0%), and 4.5 mm for SPT (sensitivity 64.1% and specificity 75.9%). Multivariate analysis identified cat sIgE positivity as the only independent risk factor for symptom development (odds ratio [OR]: 23.22, 95% confidence interval [ 95% CI]: 11.62–46.39). Environmental exposure characteristics were sig-nificant in univariate analysis; in particular, contact at home (OR: 2.35; 95% CI: 1.48–3.71; P < 0.001), family visitation/indoor contact (OR: 2.99; 95% CI: 1.88–4.74; P < 0.001), and sharing a household with a cat (OR: 3.74; 95% CI: 1.78–7.85; P < 0.001) were associated with symptom development. Positivity for the house dust mites Dermatophagoides farinae (OR: 1.59; P < 0.001) and Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (OR: 1.65; P < 0.001) and grass pollen sensitization (OR: 1.69; P < 0.001) were also significantly associated with symptomatic patients. Conclusions: Cat sIgE positivity independently predicts symptoms, with 1.05 kU/L for sIgE and 4.5 mm for SPT identified as reliable diagnostic cut-offs.
References
2. Konradsen JR, Fujisawa T, van Hage M, Hedlin G, Hilger C, Kleine-Tebbe J, et al. Allergy to furry animals: New insights, diagnostic approaches, and challenges. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135(3):616–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2014.08.026
3. Zarei M, Remer CF, Kaplan MS, Staveren AM, Lin CK, Razo E, et al. Optimal skin prick wheal size for diagnosis of cat allergy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2004;92(6):604–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61425-1
4. Kaya MŞ, Metbulut AP, Giniş T, Toyran M, Civelek E, Dibek Misırlıoğlu E. The importance of skin prick test in differentiating cat sensitivities and allergies in children. Turk J Med Sci. 2023;53(4):865–71. https://doi.org/10.55730/1300-0144.5650
5. Burbach GJ, Heinzerling LM, Edenharter G, Bachert C, Bindslev-Jensen C, Bonini S, et al. GA2LEN skin test study II: Clinical relevance of inhalant allergen sensitizations in Europe. Allergy. 2009;64(10):1507–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2009.02089.x
6. Asarnoj A, Hamsten C, Wadén K, Lupinek C, Andersson N, Kull I, et al. Sensitization to cat and dog allergen molecules in childhood and prediction of symptoms of cat and dog allergy in adolescence: A BAMSE/MeDALL study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(3):813–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.09.052
7. Gültuna S. Clinical characteristics of cat sensitized adults, cat ownership and cat owners' attitudes. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2022;43(6):e65–71. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2022.43.220066
8. Clottu A, Mahdi Aljedani R, Spertini F. Allergies aux animaux à poils: Mythes et réalités [Allergy to furry animals: Myth and reality]. Rev Med Suisse. 2020;16(689):688–93. https://doi.org/10.53738/REVMED.2020.16.689.0688
9. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global strategy for asthma management and prevention 2020 [Internet]. Available from: https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/GINA-2020-report_20_06_04-1-wms.pdf
10. Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Derm Venereol. 1980;60:44–7. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555924447
11. Brożek JL, Bousquet J, Agache I, Agarwal A, Bachert C, Bosnic-Anticevich S, et al. Allergic rhinitis and its impact on asthma (ARIA) guidelines–2016 revision. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(4):950–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.050
12. Bousquet J, Heinzerling L, Bachert C, Papadopoulos NG, Bousquet PJ, Burney PG, et al. Practical guide to skin prick tests in allergy to aeroallergens. Allergy. 2012;67(1):18–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1398-9995.2011.02728.x
13. Kang SY, Yang MS, Park SY, Kim JH, Won HK, Kwon OY, et al. The role of allergen-specific IgE in predicting allergic symptoms on dog and cat exposure among Korean pet exhibition participants. World Allergy Organ J. 2020;13(12):100488. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100488
14. Evcen R, Çölkesen F, Yıldız E, Sadi Aykan F, Kılınç M, Akkuş FA, et al. Increasing prevalence of sensitization to cat/dog allergens in the COVID-19 pandemic. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2024;185(2):133–41. https://doi.org/10.1159/000534173
15. Liccardi G, Calzetta L, Baldi G, Berra A, Billeri L, Caminati M, et al. Allergic sensitization to common pets (cats/dogs) according to different possible modalities of exposure: An Italian multicenter study. Clin Mol Allergy. 2018;16:3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12948-018-0081-z
16. Al-Ahmad M, Jusufovic E, Arifhodzic N, Nurkic J, Hanoun AL. Sensitization to cat: When is nasal challenge needed? Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2019;179(2):108–13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000496835
17. Scadding GW, Eifan A, Penagos M, Dumitru A, Switzer A, McMahon O, et al. Local and systemic effects of cat allergen nasal provocation. Clin Exp Allergy. 2015;45(3):613–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/cea.12434
18. Dávila I, Domínguez-Ortega J, Navarro-Pulido A, Alonso A, Antolín-Amerigo D, González-Mancebo E, et al. Consensus document on dog and cat allergy. Allergy. 2018;73(6):1206–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.13391
19. Linden CC, Evans MD, Barrett EG, Tisler C, Lewis TC, Mukherjee B, et al. Analysis of allergen-specific IgE cut points to cat and dog in the Childhood Allergy Study. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2011;106(2):153–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2010.11.004
20. Wood RA, Johnson EF, Van Natta ML, Chen PH, Eggleston PA. A placebo-controlled trial of a HEPA air cleaner in the treatment of cat allergy. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1998;158(1):115–20. https://doi.org/10.1164/ajrccm.158.1.9712110
21. Can Bostan O, Cakmak ME, Kaya SB, Tuncay G, Damadoglu E, Karakaya G, et al. The association of timothy grass allergy and cat ownership on cat sensitization. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2022;43(3):220–5. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2022.43.220012
22. Gelardi M, Fiorella ML, Quaranta N, Landi M, Passalacqua G. Allergic rhinitis phenotypes based on mono-allergy or poly-allergy. Inflamm Res. 2015;64:373–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00011-015-0826-9
23. Ciprandi G, Incorvaia C, Puccinelli P, Soffia S, Scurati S, Frati F, et al. Characteristics of patients with allergic polysensitization: The POLISMAIL study. Eur Ann Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008;40(3):77–83. PMID: 19334371
24. Buyuk Yaytokgil S, Metbulut AP, Giniş T, Toyran M, Civelek E, Dibek Misırlıoğlu E. Cat allergy in children and the effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2022;43(5):e31–9. https://doi.org/10.2500/aap.2022.43.220037
25. Butt A, Rashid D, Lockey RF. Do hypoallergenic cats and dogs exist? Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2012;108(2):74–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2011.12.005