The perspective of allergy and immunology specialists on the innovations of metaverse: A survey study

Pamir Cerci; Resat Kendirlinan; Ceyda Tunakan Dalgıç

doi:10.15586/aei.v51i3.829

Pamir Cerci

Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Eskisehir City Hospital, Eskisehir, Turkey.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0844-6352
Resat Kendirlinan

Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Chest Diseases, Izmir Atatürk Education and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8322-846X
Ceyda Tunakan Dalgıç

Division of Immunology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Ege University Medical Faculty, Izmir, Turkey.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0318-3135

Keywords

Allergy, Augmented Reality, Immunology, Metaverse, Virtual Reality, Web 3.0

Abstract

Background: New technologies have resulted in dramatic shifts in the field of medicine, and it stands to reason that metaverse will also affect the practice of allergy and immunology. This study aimed to determine the attitudes of allergists and raise awareness about metaverse applications in allergy and immunology.

Methods: A nationwide survey-based study was conducted in Turkey. First, a 28-item questionnaire was developed and sent to Turkish allergists. After completing the first questionnaire, the participants were asked to watch a 5-min informative video about the metaverse. Lastly, a second survey was conducted to evaluate the changes in the views of the participants.

Results: A total of 148 allergy doctors in Turkey participated in the survey. After watching a video containing updated information about the metaverse, there was a significant increase in the importance that participants attributed to the use of virtual reality and augmented reality applications in the field of immunology and allergy (P < 0.05). Additionally, there was a significant increase in the percentage of participants who thought that Metaverse applications could be integrated into the existing system and said that this possibility excited them (P < 0.05). There was also a significant increase in the percentage of participants who thought this innovative technology could be helpful in patient examination, student and physician education, allergy testing, and patient education (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Our results demonstrate that providing information to professionals working in the field can positively influence physicians’ views on the potential of the metaverse, which is a valuable tool in the field of immunology and allergy.

Abstract 83 | PDF Downloads 87 HTML Downloads 14 XML Downloads 4

References

1. Zhang X, Chen Y, Hu L, Wang Y. The metaverse in education: Definition, framework, features, potential applications, challenges, and future research topics. Front Psychol. 2022;13: 1016300. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1016300

2. Lee J, Kwon KH. The future value and direction of cosmetics in the era of metaverse. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2022;21(10):4176–83. 10.1111/jocd.14794

3. Locurcio LL. Dental education in the metaverse. Br Dent J. 2022;232(4):191. 10.1038/s41415-022-3990-7

4. Skalidis I, Muller O, Fournier S. The metaverse in cardiovascular medicine: Applications, challenges and the role of non-fungible tokens. Can J Cardiol. 2022;38(9):1467–8. 10.1016/j.cjca.2022.04.006

5. Werner H, Ribeiro G, Arcoverde V, Lopes J, Velho L. The use of metaverse in fetal medicine and gynecology. Eur J Radiol. 2022;150:110241. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110241

6. Yang D, Zhou J, Chen R, Song Y, Song Z, Zhang X, et al. Expert consensus on the metaverse in medicine. Clin eHealth. 2022;5:1–9.

7. Cerci P, Kendirlinan R. Can metaverse provide any new developments in the field of allergy and immunology? Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022;183(10):1060–1. 10.1159/000525064

8. Wu T-C, Ho C-TB. A scoping review of metaverse in emergency medicine. Australas Emerg Care. 2023;26(1):75–83. 10.1016/j.auec.2022.08.002

9. van Leeuwen FWB, van der Hage JA. Where robotic surgery meets the metaverse. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(24):6161. 10.3390/cancers14246161

10. Kurian N, Cherian JM, Varghese KG. Dentistry in the metaverse. Br Dent J. 2022;232(4):191. 10.1038/s41415-022-4003-6

11. Kye B, Han N, Kim E, Park Y, Jo S. Educational applications of metaverse: Possibilities and limitations. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2021;18:32. 10.3352/jeehp.2021.18.32

12. Sandrone S. Medical education in the metaverse. Nat Med. 2022;28(12):2456–7. 10.1038/s41591-022-02038-0

13. Invernizzi M, Runza L, De Sire A, Lippi L, Blundo C, Gambini D, et al. Integrating augmented reality tools in breast cancer related lymphedema prognostication and diagnosis. J Vis Exp. 2020;(156). 10.3791/60093

14. Liu K, Gao Y, Abdelrehem A, Zhang L, Chen X, Xie L, et al. Augmented reality navigation method for recontouring surgery of craniofacial fibrous dysplasia. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10043. 10.1038/s41598-021-88860-x

15. Ho JT, Krummenacher P, Lesur MR, Saetta G, Lenggenhager B. Real bodies not required? Placebo analgesia and pain perception in immersive virtual and augmented reality. J Pain. 2022;23(4):625–40. 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.10.009

16. Zhao J, Zhang X, Lu Y, Wu X, Zhou F, Yang S, et al. Virtual reality technology enhances the cognitive and social communication of children with autism spectrum disorder. Front Public Health. 2022;10:1029392. 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1029392

17. Beidel DC, Frueh BC, Neer SM, Bowers CA, Trachik B, Uhde TW, et al. Trauma management therapy with virtual-reality augmented exposure therapy for combat-related PTSD: A randomized controlled trial. J Anxiety Disord. 2019;61:64–74. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2017.08.005

18. Auloge P, Cazzato RL, Ramamurthy N, de Marini P, Rousseau C, Garnon J, et al. Augmented reality and artificial intelligence-based navigation during percutaneous vertebroplasty: A pilot randomised clinical trial. Eur Spine J. 2020;29(7):1580–9. 10.1007/s00586-019-06054-6

19. Eshuis LV, van Gelderen MJ, van Zuiden M, Nijdam MJ, Vermetten E, Olff M, et al. Efficacy of immersive PTSD treatments: A systematic review of virtual and augmented reality exposure therapy and a meta-analysis of virtual reality exposure therapy. J Psychiatr Res. 2021;143:516–27. 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2020.11.030

20. Barteit S, Lanfermann L, Barnighausen T, Neuhann F, Beiersmann C. Augmented, mixed, and virtual reality-based head-mounted devices for medical education: Systematic review. JMIR Serious Games. 2021;9(3):e29080. 10.2196/29080

21. Molina PJ, Almonacid SC, Blanco-Aparicio M, Dominguez-Ortega J, Giner DJ, Sanchez MN, et al. Current expert opinion and attitudes to optimize telemedicine and achieve control in patients with asthma in post-pandemic era: The COMETA consensus. Aten Primaria. 2022;54(12):102492. 10.1016/j.aprim.2022.102492

22. Chongmelaxme B, Lee S, Dhippayom T, Saokaew S, Chaiyakunapruk N, Dilokthornsakul P. The effects of tele-medicine on asthma control and patients’ quality of life in adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(1):199–216.e11. 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.07.015

23. Wu AC, Rehman N, Portnoy J. The good, the bad, and the unknown of telemedicine in asthma and allergy practice. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(8):2580–2. 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.08.017

24. Nucera E, Rizzi A, Agrosi C, Lohmeyer FM, Inchingolo R. Lung function tests, quality of life and telemedicine: Three windows on the multifaceted world of asthma in adolescents. Children (Basel). 2022;9(4):476. 10.3390/children9040476