The role of basophil activation test in the diagnosis of pediatric egg allergy in Turkey: A comparison of clinical and laboratory findings with Real-Life Data
Main Article Content
Keywords
basophil activation test, egg allergy, oral provocation test, skin prick test, spIgE
Abstract
Background: Egg allergy is among the most common food allergies in children, significantly affecting the dietary habits and quality of life of both the affected children and their families. This study aims to assess the clinical role of the Basophil Activation Test (BAT) in children with egg allergy and to evaluate its diagnostic accuracy in comparison to other tests.
Methods: The study included 46 children with egg allergy. Patients were classified into three groups: IgE-mediated, non-IgE-mediated, and mixed-type allergies. Each patient underwent a Skin Prick Test, serum-specific IgE test, BAT, and Oral Food Challenge. The sensitivity and specificity of each diagnostic test were evaluated.
Results: Egg SpIgE positivity was observed in all patients with IgE-mediated allergy (100%) and in 77.78% of those with mixed-type allergy, while only 47.1% of patients with non-IgE-mediated allergy were positive (p = 0.008). BAT positivity was significantly higher in IgE-mediated (72.7%) and mixed-type allergies (50.0%) compared to non-IgE-mediated allergies (17.6%) (p = 0.013). Compared to the oral provocation test, Egg SpIgE had a sensitivity of 0.73 and specificity of 0.33, BAT had a sensitivity of 0.46 and specificity of 0.67, and SPT had a sensitivity of 0.44 and specificity of 0.60. Although Egg SpIgE demonstrated the highest sensitivity, its low specificity makes it less reliable for accurately identifying non-allergic individuals. In contrast, BAT, with its highest specificity and moderate sensitivity, aligns more closely with the oral provocation test in accurately diagnosing egg allergy.
Conclusion: When comparing the positivity rates of Egg SpIgE, BAT, and SPT according to allergy types, IgE-mediated allergies showed significantly higher positivity rates. BAT demonstrated high specificity and moderate sensitivity in both IgE-mediated and mixed-type allergies, making it the most compatible test with the oral provocation test for the accurate diagnosis of egg allergy. Given that this test is currently used only for research purposes in our country, it is recommended that BAT be more widely adopted in clinical practice in accordance with guideline recommendations.
References
2 Koplin JJ, Wake M, Dharmage SC, et al. Cohort Profile: The HealthNuts Study: population prevalence and environmental/genetic predictors of food allergy. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(4):1161–1171. 10.1093/ije/dyu261
3 Licari A, D’Auria E, De Amici M, et al. The role of basophil activation test and component-resolved diagnostics in the workup of egg allergy in children at low risk for severe allergic reactions: A real-life study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2023;34(8):e14012. 10.1111/pai.14012
4 Santos AF, Riggioni C, Agache I, et al. EAACI guidelines on the diagnosis of IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy. 2023;78(12):3057–3076. 10.1111/all.15902
5 Radulovic S, Foong RX, Bartha I, et al. Basophil activation test as predictor of severity and threshold of allergic reactions to egg. Allergy. 2024;79(2):419–431. 10.1111/all.15875
6 Santos AF, Alpan O, Hoffmann HJ. Basophil activation test: Mechanisms and considerations for use in clinical trials and clinical practice. Allergy. 2021;76(8):2420–2432. 10.1111/all.14747
7 Bergmann MM, Santos AF. Basophil activation test in the food allergy clinic: its current use and future applications. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. (Published online April 10, 2024). 10.1080/1744666X.2024.2336568
8 Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Assa’ad AH, Bahna SL, et al. Work Group report: oral food challenge testing. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2009;123(6 Suppl):S365–83. 10.1016/j.jaci.2009.03.042
9 Samady W, Warren C, Wang J, Das R, Gupta RS. Egg Allergy in US Children. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2020;8(9):3066–73.e6. 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.04.058
10 Dona DW, Suphioglu C. Egg allergy: diagnosis and ımmunotherapy. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(14):5010. 10.3390/ijms21145010
11 Peters RL, Koplin JJ, Gurrin LC, et al. The prevalence of food allergy and other allergic diseases in early childhood in a population-based study: HealthNuts age 4-year follow-up. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017;140(1):145–153.e8. 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.02.019
12 Ünsal H, Dal ST, Akarsu A, Şahiner ÜM, Soyer Ö, Şekerel BE. Phenotypes of persistent hen`s egg allergy in children and adolescents. Turk J Pediatr. 2023;65(1):3–12. 10.24953/turkjped.2021.5417
13 Prescott S, Allen KJ. Food allergy: riding the second wave of the allergy epidemic. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2011;22(2):155–160. 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2011.01145.x
14 Garcia-Larsen V, Ierodiakonou D, Jarrold K, et al. Diet during pregnancy and infancy and risk of allergic or autoimmune disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2018;15(2):e1002507. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002507
15 Kristensen K, Henriksen L. Cesarean section and disease associated with immune function. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;137(2):587–590. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.07.040
16 Ekelund L, Gloppen I, Øien T, Simpson MR. Duration of breastfeeding, age at introduction of complementary foods and allergy-related diseases: a prospective cohort study. Int Breastfeed J. 2021;16(1):5. 10.1186/s13006-020-00352-2
17 Tan JW, Joshi P. Egg allergy: an update. J Paediatr Child Health. 2014;50(1):11–15. 10.1111/jpc.12408
18 NIAID-Sponsored Expert Panel, Boyce JA, Assa’ad A, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of food allergy in the United States: report of the NIAID-sponsored expert panel. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(6 Suppl):S1–S58. 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.007
19 Manca E, Demoly P, Caimmi D. IgE-mediated egg allergy in children: Diagnosis and management. J Allergy Hypersensitivity Dis. 2024;1:100003. 10.1016/j.jahd.2023.100003
20 Waserman S, Bégin P, Watson W. IgE-mediated food allergy. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2018;14(Suppl 2):55. 10.1186/s13223-018-0284-3
