Characteristics of childhood anaphylaxis in different age groups
Main Article Content
Keywords
adrenaline, anaphylaxis, children, drug allergy, food allergy, venom allergy
Abstract
Background: Anaphylaxis is a severe systemic hypersensitivity reaction that usually has a rapid onset and can be fatal. Presentations of childhood anaphylaxis vary widely in accordance with the triggers and the patient’s age, geographical region and dietary and lifestyle habits.
Methods: The medical records of 177 paediatric patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis between January 2021 and January 2024, whose disease progression was monitored at a single tertiary care centre, were reviewed retrospectively.
Results: The study included 177 patients diagnosed with anaphylaxis (107 males and 70 females with a median age of 48 months). The most common allergen responsible was food (53.7%). Egg allergy was the most common source of anaphylaxis, afflicting 35 patients (19.3%), while beta-lactam provoked the most common drug allergy, affecting 24 patients (13.6%). The most common organ involved was the skin (92.7%). When the patients were analysed by age group, there were more males in the infancy, preschool and school age groups, while there were more females in the adolescent group (p = 0.44). Food-induced anaphylaxis became less common with increasing age, whereas the rate of drug-induced anaphylaxis increased (p = 0.01 and p = 0.01, respectively). Cardiovascular system findings were observed more frequently in adolescents compared to other age groups (p = 0.003). Most cases stemming from a food allergy were mild, whereas most drug-induced cases were moderate or severe (p < 0.05). When severity was analysed by age group, mild cases in infants were more common than moderate to severe cases.
Conclusion: The aetiological and clinical manifestations of childhood anaphylaxis vary among different age groups.
References
2. Baskaya N, Ertugrul A, Esenboga S, Ozmen S. Different age groups present different clinics in anaphylaxis with children: one size does not fit all children Turk J Med Sci. 2023; 53(2):495–503. 10.55730/1300-0144.5609
3. Anaphylaxis Working Group of Resuscitation Council UK. Emergency treatment of anaphylaxis: guidelines for healthcare providers. May 2021. Available at https://www.resus.org.uk/sites/default/files/2021-05/Emergency%20Treatment%20of%20Anaphylaxis%20May%202021_0.pdf (Accessed April 20, 2024).
4. Jiang N, Xu W, Xiang L. Age-related differences in characteristics of anaphylaxis in Chinese children from infancy to adolescence. World Allergy Organ J. 2021; 14(11):100605. 10.1016/j.waojou.2021.100605
5. Grabenhenrich LB, Dölle S, Moneret-Vautrin A, Köhli A, Lange L, Spindler T, et al. Anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: the European anaphylaxis registry. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016; 137(4):1128–37.e1. 10.1016/j.jaci.2015.11.015
6. Kitamura K, Ito T, Ito K. Comprehensive hospital-based regional survey of anaphylaxis in Japanese children: time trends of triggers and adrenaline use. Allergol Int. 2021; 70(4):452–7. 10.1016/j.alit.2021.04.009
7. Wang Y, Koplin JJ, Ho MHK, Wong WHS, Allen KJ. Increasing hospital presentations for anaphylaxis in the pediatric population in Hong Kong. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018; 6(3):1050–2.e2. 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.09.018
8. Kim SL, Suresh R, Mayampurath A, Ciaccio CE. Increase in epinephrine administration for food-induced anaphylaxis in pediatric emergency departments from 2007 to 2015. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022; 10(1):200–5.e1. 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.09.024
9. Gaspar Â, Santos N, Faria E, Pereira AM, Gomes E, Câmara R, et al. Anaphylaxis in children and adolescents: the Portuguese anaphylaxis registry. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2021; 32(6):1278–86. 10.1111/pai.13511
10. Serbes M, Sasihuseyinoglu AS, Ozcan D, Ufuk Altıntas D. Clinical features of anaphylaxis in children. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2022; 43(1):50–6. 10.2500/aap.2022.43.210089
11. Turgay Yagmur I, Kulhas Celik I, Yilmaz Topal O, Civelek E, Toyran M, Karaatmaca B, et al. Etiology, clinical features and severity of childhood anaphylaxis by age groups. Int Arch Allergy Immunol. 2022; 183(6):600–10. 10.1159/000521063
12. Poor KM, Ducklow TB. Benefit of BP measurement in pediatric ED patients. ISRN Nurs. 2012; 2012:1–6. 10.5402/2012/627354
13. Soriano VX, Ciciulla D, Gell G, Wang Y, Peters RL, McWilliam V, et al. Complementary and allergenic food introduction in infants: an umbrella review. Pediatrics. 2023; 151(2):e2022058380. 10.1542/peds.2022-058380
14. Yu JE, Lin RY. The epidemiology of anaphylaxis. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2018; 54(3):366–74. 10.1007/s12016-015-8503-x
15. Orhan F, Canitez Y, Bakirtas A, Yilmaz O, Boz AB, Can D, et al. Anaphylaxis in Turkish children: a multi-centre, retrospective, case study. Clinical and Experimental Allergy. 2011; 41(12): 1767–76. 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2011.03859.x
16. Türkiye İller Bazında Arıcılık İstatistikleri (2022). Available at http://arastirma.tarimorman.gov.tr/aricilik/Link/2/Aricilik-Istatistikleri (Accessed April 20, 2024.)
17. Kahveci M, Akarsu A, Koken G, Sahiner UM, Soyer O, Sekerel BE. Food-induced anaphylaxis in infants, as compared to toddlers and preschool children in Turkey. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2020; 31(8):954–61. 10.1111/pai.13320
18. Greenhawt M, Gupta RS, Meadows JA, Pistiner M, Spergel JM, Camargo CA Jr, et al. Guiding principles for the recognition, diagnosis, and management of infants with anaphylaxis: an expert panel consensus. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019; 7(4):1148–56.e5. 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.10.052
Article Sidebar
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.